1963 AC Aceca vs. 1980 Nissan Stanza
To start off, 1980 Nissan Stanza is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Aceca would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 AC Aceca (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1980 Nissan Stanza. (93 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1980 Nissan Stanza. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Nissan Stanza weights approximately 61 kg more than 1963 AC Aceca.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 AC Aceca (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Nissan Stanza. (138 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1963 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Nissan Stanza.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 AC Aceca | 1980 Nissan Stanza | |
| Make | AC | Nissan |
| Model | Aceca | Stanza |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1595 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 138 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 955 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1610 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2410 mm |
