1963 AC Aceca vs. 1981 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1981 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Aceca would be higher. At 4,097 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 661 kg more than 1963 AC Aceca.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 AC Aceca | 1981 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | AC | Chevrolet |
| Model | Aceca | Camaro |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4097 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1555 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1900 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2750 mm |
