1963 AC Aceca vs. 1982 Audi Coupe
To start off, 1982 Audi Coupe is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Aceca would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1982 Audi Coupe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Audi Coupe (130 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1963 AC Aceca. (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Audi Coupe should accelerate faster than 1963 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Audi Coupe weights approximately 156 kg more than 1963 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Audi Coupe, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Audi Coupe (171 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 AC Aceca. (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1982 Audi Coupe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
1963 AC Aceca | 1982 Audi Coupe | |
Make | AC | Audi |
Model | Aceca | Coupe |
Year Released | 1963 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2144 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5900 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 171 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 79.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 86.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2550 mm |