1963 AC Aceca vs. 1982 Autobianchi A 112
To start off, 1982 Autobianchi A 112 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Aceca would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 AC Aceca weights approximately 234 kg more than 1982 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 1963 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 AC Aceca | 1982 Autobianchi A 112 | |
Make | AC | Autobianchi |
Model | Aceca | A 112 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 965 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2050 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 30 L |