1963 AC Aceca vs. 1992 Mercedes-Benz 420
To start off, 1992 Mercedes-Benz 420 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Aceca would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 1992 Mercedes-Benz 420 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mercedes-Benz 420 (296 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 1963 AC Aceca. (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mercedes-Benz 420 should accelerate faster than 1963 AC Aceca.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Mercedes-Benz 420 (410 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 243 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 AC Aceca. (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1992 Mercedes-Benz 420 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
1963 AC Aceca | 1992 Mercedes-Benz 420 | |
Make | AC | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Aceca | 420 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 296 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 410 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 100 L |