1963 AC Aceca vs. 1995 BMW Dinan
To start off, 1995 BMW Dinan is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Aceca would be higher. At 5,598 cc (12 cylinders), 1995 BMW Dinan is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 BMW Dinan (976 Nm) has 809 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 AC Aceca. (167 Nm). This means 1995 BMW Dinan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
1963 AC Aceca | 1995 BMW Dinan | |
Make | AC | BMW |
Model | Aceca | Dinan |
Year Released | 1963 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 5598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 976 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2770 mm |