1963 AC Aceca vs. 1996 Ford Falcon

To start off, 1996 Ford Falcon is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Aceca would be higher. At 3,707 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Falcon (228 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1963 AC Aceca. (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1963 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Falcon weights approximately 686 kg more than 1963 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Ford Falcon (398 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 231 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 AC Aceca. (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1996 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 AC Aceca.

Compare all specifications:

1963 AC Aceca 1996 Ford Falcon
Make AC Ford
Model Aceca Falcon
Year Released 1963 1996
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1971 cc 3707 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 123 HP 228 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 4500 RPM
Torque 167 Nm 398 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 3000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 894 kg 1580 kg
Vehicle Length 4070 mm 4910 mm
Vehicle Width 1560 mm 1870 mm
Vehicle Height 1330 mm 1460 mm
Wheelbase Size 2290 mm 2800 mm