1963 AC Aceca vs. 2001 Dodge Power Box
To start off, 2001 Dodge Power Box is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Aceca would be higher. At 2,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Dodge Power Box is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Dodge Power Box (251 HP) has 128 more horse power than 1963 AC Aceca. (123 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Dodge Power Box should accelerate faster than 1963 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Dodge Power Box weights approximately 920 kg more than 1963 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 Dodge Power Box is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Dodge Power Box will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 AC Aceca | 2001 Dodge Power Box | |
Make | AC | Dodge |
Model | Aceca | Power Box |
Year Released | 1963 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 251 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1814 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1890 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 49 L |