1963 AC Aceca vs. 2005 Audi S4
To start off, 2005 Audi S4 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Aceca would be higher. At 4,163 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Audi S4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi S4 (340 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 217 more horse power than 1963 AC Aceca. (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi S4 should accelerate faster than 1963 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Audi S4 weights approximately 841 kg more than 1963 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Audi S4 (410 Nm) has 243 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 AC Aceca. (167 Nm). This means 2005 Audi S4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
1963 AC Aceca | 2005 Audi S4 | |
Make | AC | Audi |
Model | Aceca | S4 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4163 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 5 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 340 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 410 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 85.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 11.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1735 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 63 L |