1963 AC Aceca vs. 2005 Ford Explorer
To start off, 2005 Ford Explorer is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Aceca would be higher. At 4,014 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Explorer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Explorer (210 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1963 AC Aceca. (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Explorer should accelerate faster than 1963 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Explorer weights approximately 386 kg more than 1963 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Explorer (330 Nm) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 AC Aceca. (167 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Explorer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
1963 AC Aceca | 2005 Ford Explorer | |
Make | AC | Ford |
Model | Aceca | Explorer |
Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4014 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 330 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.7:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2870 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 85 L |