1963 AC Aceca vs. 2005 Renault Megane
To start off, 2005 Renault Megane is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Aceca would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 AC Aceca (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2005 Renault Megane. (110 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Megane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Megane weights approximately 806 kg more than 1963 AC Aceca.
Because 1963 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 AC Aceca (167 Nm) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Megane. (101 Nm). This means 1963 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Megane.
Compare all specifications:
1963 AC Aceca | 2005 Renault Megane | |
Make | AC | Renault |
Model | Aceca | Megane |
Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 101 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1700 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2690 mm |