1963 AC Aceca vs. 2009 Mercedes-Benz S
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz S is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Aceca would be higher. At 5,980 cc, 2009 Mercedes-Benz S is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercedes-Benz S (604 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 481 more horse power than 1963 AC Aceca. (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz S should accelerate faster than 1963 AC Aceca.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mercedes-Benz S (1,000 Nm @ 200 RPM) has 833 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 AC Aceca. (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2009 Mercedes-Benz S will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
1963 AC Aceca | 2009 Mercedes-Benz S | |
Make | AC | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Aceca | S |
Year Released | 1963 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 5980 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 604 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 1000 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3170 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 90 L |