1963 AC Cobra vs. 1958 Lotus 16
To start off, 1963 AC Cobra is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Lotus 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Lotus 16 would be higher. At 4,727 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 AC Cobra (271 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1958 Lotus 16. (238 HP @ 6750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 1958 Lotus 16. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 AC Cobra weights approximately 500 kg more than 1958 Lotus 16. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 AC Cobra | 1958 Lotus 16 | |
| Make | AC | Lotus |
| Model | Cobra | 16 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1958 |
| Engine Size | 4727 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 271 HP | 238 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 550 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 3510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2260 mm |
