1963 AC Cobra vs. 1964 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1964 Cadillac 62 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Cobra would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 AC Cobra (271 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 980 kg more than 1963 AC Cobra.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 AC Cobra | 1964 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | AC | Cadillac |
| Model | Cobra | 62 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4727 cc | 7029 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 271 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 2030 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 5690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 75 L |
