1963 AC Cobra vs. 1979 Triumph TR8
To start off, 1979 Triumph TR8 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Cobra would be higher. At 4,727 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 AC Cobra (271 HP) has 116 more horse power than 1979 Triumph TR8. (155 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 1979 Triumph TR8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 AC Cobra weights approximately 235 kg more than 1979 Triumph TR8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 AC Cobra | 1979 Triumph TR8 | |
Make | AC | Triumph |
Model | Cobra | TR8 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1979 |
Body Type | Roadster | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4727 cc | 3532 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 271 HP | 155 HP |
Top Speed | 217 km/hour | 217 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 815 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2170 mm |