1963 AC Cobra vs. 1983 Datsun 280
To start off, 1983 Datsun 280 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Cobra would be higher. At 4,727 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 AC Cobra (271 HP) has 91 more horse power than 1983 Datsun 280. (180 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 1983 Datsun 280. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Datsun 280 weights approximately 380 kg more than 1963 AC Cobra.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 AC Cobra (423 Nm) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Datsun 280. (275 Nm). This means 1963 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Datsun 280.
Compare all specifications:
1963 AC Cobra | 1983 Datsun 280 | |
Make | AC | Datsun |
Model | Cobra | 280 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1983 |
Body Type | Roadster | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4727 cc | 2753 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 271 HP | 180 HP |
Torque | 423 Nm | 275 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 7.4:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1430 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2330 mm |