1963 AC Cobra vs. 1987 Ford Aerostar
To start off, 1987 Ford Aerostar is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Cobra would be higher. At 4,727 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 AC Cobra (271 HP) has 183 more horse power than 1987 Ford Aerostar. (88 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 1987 Ford Aerostar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1987 Ford Aerostar weights approximately 360 kg more than 1963 AC Cobra.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 AC Cobra (423 Nm) has 263 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Ford Aerostar. (160 Nm). This means 1963 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Ford Aerostar.
Compare all specifications:
1963 AC Cobra | 1987 Ford Aerostar | |
Make | AC | Ford |
Model | Cobra | Aerostar |
Year Released | 1963 | 1987 |
Body Type | Roadster | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4727 cc | 2302 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 271 HP | 88 HP |
Torque | 423 Nm | 160 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3030 mm |