1963 AC Cobra vs. 1992 Acura Integra
To start off, 1992 Acura Integra is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Cobra would be higher. At 4,727 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 AC Cobra (271 HP) has 133 more horse power than 1992 Acura Integra. (138 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 1992 Acura Integra.
Because 1963 AC Cobra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 AC Cobra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 AC Cobra (423 Nm) has 260 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Acura Integra. (163 Nm). This means 1963 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Acura Integra.
Compare all specifications:
1963 AC Cobra | 1992 Acura Integra | |
Make | AC | Acura |
Model | Cobra | Integra |
Year Released | 1963 | 1992 |
Body Type | Roadster | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4727 cc | 1799 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 271 HP | 138 HP |
Torque | 423 Nm | 163 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.2:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2560 mm |