1963 AC Cobra vs. 1992 BMW 520
To start off, 1992 BMW 520 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Cobra would be higher. At 4,727 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 AC Cobra (271 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1992 BMW 520. (148 HP @ 5900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 1992 BMW 520. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 BMW 520 weights approximately 438 kg more than 1963 AC Cobra.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 AC Cobra (423 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 233 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 BMW 520. (190 Nm @ 4700 RPM). This means 1963 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 BMW 520.
Compare all specifications:
1963 AC Cobra | 1992 BMW 520 | |
Make | AC | BMW |
Model | Cobra | 520 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1992 |
Body Type | Roadster | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4727 cc | 1990 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 271 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5900 RPM |
Torque | 423 Nm | 190 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1488 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1400 mm |