1963 AC Cobra vs. 1997 MCC Smart
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Cobra would be higher. At 4,727 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 AC Cobra (271 HP) has 218 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 AC Cobra weights approximately 400 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 AC Cobra | 1997 MCC Smart | |
| Make | AC | MCC |
| Model | Cobra | Smart |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1997 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 4727 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 271 HP | 53 HP |
| Top Speed | 217 km/hour | 129 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 2510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1460 mm |
