1963 AC Cobra vs. 1997 Suzuki Sidekick
To start off, 1997 Suzuki Sidekick is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Cobra would be higher. At 4,727 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 AC Cobra (271 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 201 more horse power than 1997 Suzuki Sidekick. (70 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 1997 Suzuki Sidekick.
Because 1963 AC Cobra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 AC Cobra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Suzuki Sidekick, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 AC Cobra (423 Nm) has 290 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Suzuki Sidekick. (133 Nm). This means 1963 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Suzuki Sidekick.
Compare all specifications:
1963 AC Cobra | 1997 Suzuki Sidekick | |
Make | AC | Suzuki |
Model | Cobra | Sidekick |
Year Released | 1963 | 1997 |
Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4727 cc | 1599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 271 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 423 Nm | 133 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 3660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 30 L |