1963 AC Cobra vs. 2000 Fiat Siena
To start off, 2000 Fiat Siena is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Cobra would be higher. At 4,727 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 AC Cobra (271 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 220 more horse power than 2000 Fiat Siena. (51 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 2000 Fiat Siena. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Fiat Siena weights approximately 250 kg more than 1963 AC Cobra.
Because 1963 AC Cobra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 AC Cobra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Fiat Siena, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 AC Cobra (423 Nm) has 223 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Fiat Siena. (200 Nm). This means 1963 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Fiat Siena.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 AC Cobra | 2000 Fiat Siena | |
| Make | AC | Fiat |
| Model | Cobra | Siena |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4727 cc | 1910 cc |
| Horse Power | 271 HP | 51 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 423 Nm | 200 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1300 kg |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 65 L |
