1963 AC Cobra vs. 2002 Buick Cielo

To start off, 2002 Buick Cielo is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Cobra would be higher. At 4,727 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 AC Cobra (271 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2002 Buick Cielo. (241 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 2002 Buick Cielo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Buick Cielo weights approximately 470 kg more than 1963 AC Cobra.

Because 1963 AC Cobra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 AC Cobra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Buick Cielo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 AC Cobra (423 Nm) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Buick Cielo. (387 Nm). This means 1963 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Buick Cielo. 2002 Buick Cielo has automatic transmission and 1963 AC Cobra has manual transmission. 1963 AC Cobra will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Buick Cielo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: