1963 AC Cobra vs. 2005 Chevrolet Colorado
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Cobra would be higher. At 4,727 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 AC Cobra (271 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet Colorado. (175 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet Colorado. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 137 kg more than 1963 AC Cobra.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 AC Cobra (423 Nm) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chevrolet Colorado. (251 Nm). This means 1963 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chevrolet Colorado.
Compare all specifications:
1963 AC Cobra | 2005 Chevrolet Colorado | |
Make | AC | Chevrolet |
Model | Cobra | Colorado |
Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
Body Type | Roadster | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4727 cc | 2770 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 271 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 423 Nm | 251 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1187 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 72 L |