1963 AC Cobra vs. 2005 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2005 Ford Econoline is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Cobra would be higher. At 4,727 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 AC Cobra (271 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 2005 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1275 kg more than 1963 AC Cobra.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 AC Cobra (423 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 1963 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
1963 AC Cobra | 2005 Ford Econoline | |
Make | AC | Ford |
Model | Cobra | Econoline |
Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
Body Type | Roadster | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4727 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 271 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 423 Nm | 338 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 2325 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3510 mm |