1963 AC Cobra vs. 2005 Mahindra CL
To start off, 2005 Mahindra CL is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Cobra would be higher. At 4,727 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 AC Cobra (271 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 209 more horse power than 2005 Mahindra CL. (62 HP @ 3200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 2005 Mahindra CL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mahindra CL weights approximately 250 kg more than 1963 AC Cobra.
Because 2005 Mahindra CL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 AC Cobra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mahindra CL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 AC Cobra (423 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 258 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mahindra CL. (165 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 1963 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mahindra CL.
Compare all specifications:
1963 AC Cobra | 2005 Mahindra CL | |
Make | AC | Mahindra |
Model | Cobra | CL |
Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4727 cc | 2523 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 271 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Torque | 423 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 3360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2040 mm |