1963 AC Cobra vs. 2006 Isuzu KB
To start off, 2006 Isuzu KB is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Cobra would be higher. At 4,727 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 AC Cobra (271 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 2006 Isuzu KB. (197 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 2006 Isuzu KB.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 AC Cobra (423 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Isuzu KB. (281 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1963 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Isuzu KB.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 AC Cobra | 2006 Isuzu KB | |
| Make | AC | Isuzu |
| Model | Cobra | KB |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4727 cc | 3494 cc |
| Horse Power | 271 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 423 Nm | 281 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1740 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 76 L |
