1963 AC Cobra vs. 2006 Mazda 3
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Cobra would be higher. At 4,727 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 AC Cobra (271 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 2006 Mazda 3. (139 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda 3 weights approximately 84 kg more than 1963 AC Cobra.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 AC Cobra (423 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 241 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 3. (182 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1963 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
1963 AC Cobra | 2006 Mazda 3 | |
Make | AC | Mazda |
Model | Cobra | 3 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2006 |
Body Type | Roadster | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4727 cc | 1998 cc |
Horse Power | 271 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 423 Nm | 182 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1134 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 55 L |