1963 AC Cobra vs. 2007 Holden UTE
To start off, 2007 Holden UTE is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Cobra would be higher. At 4,727 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 AC Cobra (271 HP) has 10 more horse power than 2007 Holden UTE. (261 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 2007 Holden UTE.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 AC Cobra (423 Nm) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Holden UTE. (340 Nm). This means 1963 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Holden UTE.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 AC Cobra | 2007 Holden UTE | |
| Make | AC | Holden |
| Model | Cobra | UTE |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2007 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4727 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 271 HP | 261 HP |
| Torque | 423 Nm | 340 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
