1963 AC Cobra vs. 2007 Mazda RX-8

To start off, 2007 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Cobra would be higher. At 4,727 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 AC Cobra (271 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 2007 Mazda RX-8. (228 HP @ 8200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 2007 Mazda RX-8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Mazda RX-8 weights approximately 375 kg more than 1963 AC Cobra.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 AC Cobra (423 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 212 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Mazda RX-8. (211 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 1963 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Mazda RX-8.

Compare all specifications:

1963 AC Cobra 2007 Mazda RX-8
Make AC Mazda
Model Cobra RX-8
Year Released 1963 2007
Body Type Roadster Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4727 cc 1307 cc
Engine Type V dual-disk rotary
Horse Power 271 HP 228 HP
Engine RPM 5750 RPM 8200 RPM
Torque 423 Nm 211 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 5500 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 11.0:1 10.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Top Speed 217 km/hour 235 km/hour
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1050 kg 1425 kg
Vehicle Length 3850 mm 4440 mm
Vehicle Width 1560 mm 1780 mm
Vehicle Height 1250 mm 1350 mm
Wheelbase Size 2290 mm 2710 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 68 L 61 L