1963 AC Cobra vs. 2007 Toyota Dyna
To start off, 2007 Toyota Dyna is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Cobra would be higher. At 4,727 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 AC Cobra (271 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 181 more horse power than 2007 Toyota Dyna. (90 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 2007 Toyota Dyna.
Because 2007 Toyota Dyna is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 AC Cobra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Toyota Dyna will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 AC Cobra (423 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 231 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Toyota Dyna. (192 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1963 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Toyota Dyna.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 AC Cobra | 2007 Toyota Dyna | |
| Make | AC | Toyota |
| Model | Cobra | Dyna |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2007 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4727 cc | 2986 cc |
| Horse Power | 271 HP | 90 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 423 Nm | 192 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1970 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2550 mm |
