1963 AC Cobra vs. 2008 Nissan Almera
To start off, 2008 Nissan Almera is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Cobra would be higher. At 4,727 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan Almera weights approximately 80 kg more than 1963 AC Cobra.
Because 1963 AC Cobra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 AC Cobra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Almera, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 AC Cobra (423 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 262 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Nissan Almera. (161 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1963 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Nissan Almera.
Compare all specifications:
1963 AC Cobra | 2008 Nissan Almera | |
Make | AC | Nissan |
Model | Cobra | Almera |
Year Released | 1963 | 2008 |
Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4727 cc | 1768 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 271 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 423 Nm | 161 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1130 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 60 L |