1963 AC Cobra vs. 2009 Mitsubishi i-MiEV
To start off, 2009 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Cobra would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mitsubishi i-MiEV weights approximately 30 kg more than 1963 AC Cobra.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 AC Cobra | 2009 Mitsubishi i-MiEV | |
| Make | AC | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Cobra | i-MiEV |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Horse Power | 271 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1080 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 3395 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1475 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1600 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2550 mm |
