1963 AC Cobra vs. 2012 Audi A6
To start off, 2012 Audi A6 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Cobra would be higher. At 4,727 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 AC Cobra (271 HP) has 29 more horse power than 2012 Audi A6. (242 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 2012 Audi A6.
Because 1963 AC Cobra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 AC Cobra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 AC Cobra | 2012 Audi A6 | |
Make | AC | Audi |
Model | Cobra | A6 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4727 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 271 HP | 242 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4915 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1872 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1453 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2911 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 75 L |