1963 AC Cobra vs. 2012 Chevrolet Captiva
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Cobra would be higher. At 4,727 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 AC Cobra (271 HP) has 106 more horse power than 2012 Chevrolet Captiva. (165 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 2012 Chevrolet Captiva.
Because 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 AC Cobra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 AC Cobra (423 Nm) has 193 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Captiva. (230 Nm). This means 1963 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Captiva.
Compare all specifications:
1963 AC Cobra | 2012 Chevrolet Captiva | |
Make | AC | Chevrolet |
Model | Cobra | Captiva |
Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4727 cc | 2384 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 271 HP | 165 HP |
Torque | 423 Nm | 230 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4673 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1849 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1756 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2707 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 65 L |