1963 AC Cobra vs. 2012 Proton Gen-2
To start off, 2012 Proton Gen-2 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Cobra would be higher. At 4,727 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 AC Cobra (271 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 2012 Proton Gen-2. (108 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 2012 Proton Gen-2.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 AC Cobra (423 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 275 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Proton Gen-2. (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1963 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Proton Gen-2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 AC Cobra | 2012 Proton Gen-2 | |
| Make | AC | Proton |
| Model | Cobra | Gen-2 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Hatchback |
| Engine Size | 4727 cc | 1597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 271 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 423 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2610 mm |
