1963 AC Greyhound vs. 1952 Jaguar XK
To start off, 1963 AC Greyhound is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Jaguar XK (158 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1963 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1963 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Jaguar XK weights approximately 280 kg more than 1963 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar XK (290 Nm) has 111 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 1952 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 AC Greyhound | 1952 Jaguar XK | |
| Make | AC | Jaguar |
| Model | Greyhound | XK |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3441 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 290 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1295 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2600 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 63 L |
