1963 AC Greyhound vs. 1962 Austin A 40
To start off, 1963 AC Greyhound is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 AC Greyhound is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 AC Greyhound (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 40. (36 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 AC Greyhound should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 AC Greyhound weights approximately 255 kg more than 1962 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 AC Greyhound (179 Nm) has 111 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 40. (68 Nm). This means 1963 AC Greyhound will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1963 AC Greyhound | 1962 Austin A 40 | |
Make | AC | Austin |
Model | Greyhound | A 40 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 948 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 36 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 68 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 760 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1520 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2220 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 45 L |