1963 AC Greyhound vs. 1964 Jaguar MK II
To start off, 1964 Jaguar MK II is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 2,483 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Jaguar MK II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 AC Greyhound (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1964 Jaguar MK II. (120 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 AC Greyhound should accelerate faster than 1964 Jaguar MK II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Jaguar MK II weights approximately 435 kg more than 1963 AC Greyhound.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Jaguar MK II (196 Nm) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 1964 Jaguar MK II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 AC Greyhound | 1964 Jaguar MK II | |
| Make | AC | Jaguar |
| Model | Greyhound | MK II |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2483 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 120 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 196 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1450 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 5000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1600 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2900 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 63 L |
