1963 AC Greyhound vs. 1966 Fiat Cabriolet
To start off, 1966 Fiat Cabriolet is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 AC Greyhound is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 AC Greyhound (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1966 Fiat Cabriolet. (62 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 AC Greyhound should accelerate faster than 1966 Fiat Cabriolet. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 AC Greyhound weights approximately 125 kg more than 1966 Fiat Cabriolet. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 AC Greyhound (179 Nm) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Fiat Cabriolet. (94 Nm). This means 1963 AC Greyhound will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Fiat Cabriolet.
Compare all specifications:
1963 AC Greyhound | 1966 Fiat Cabriolet | |
Make | AC | Fiat |
Model | Greyhound | Cabriolet |
Year Released | 1963 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1221 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 94 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 890 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2350 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 37 L |