1963 AC Greyhound vs. 1966 Maserati Mistral
To start off, 1966 Maserati Mistral is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 4,014 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Maserati Mistral is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Maserati Mistral (252 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 1963 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Maserati Mistral should accelerate faster than 1963 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Maserati Mistral weights approximately 250 kg more than 1963 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1966 Maserati Mistral (363 Nm) has 184 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 1966 Maserati Mistral will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1963 AC Greyhound | 1966 Maserati Mistral | |
Make | AC | Maserati |
Model | Greyhound | Mistral |
Year Released | 1963 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4014 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 252 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 363 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1265 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2410 mm |