1963 AC Greyhound vs. 1969 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 1969 Cadillac Brougham is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac Brougham (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1963 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 1963 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1165 kg more than 1963 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 AC Greyhound | 1969 Cadillac Brougham | |
| Make | AC | Cadillac |
| Model | Greyhound | Brougham |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 7734 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 228 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 2180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 5790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3390 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 79 L |
