1963 AC Greyhound vs. 1974 Mazda RX-3
To start off, 1974 Mazda RX-3 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 AC Greyhound is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 AC Greyhound (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1974 Mazda RX-3. (100 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 AC Greyhound should accelerate faster than 1974 Mazda RX-3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 AC Greyhound weights approximately 165 kg more than 1974 Mazda RX-3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 AC Greyhound (179 Nm) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Mazda RX-3. (135 Nm). This means 1963 AC Greyhound will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Mazda RX-3.
Compare all specifications:
1963 AC Greyhound | 1974 Mazda RX-3 | |
Make | AC | Mazda |
Model | Greyhound | RX-3 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1962 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 135 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2320 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 65 L |