1963 AC Greyhound vs. 1976 Zastava 1500
To start off, 1976 Zastava 1500 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 AC Greyhound is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 AC Greyhound (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1976 Zastava 1500. (70 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 AC Greyhound should accelerate faster than 1976 Zastava 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 AC Greyhound weights approximately 5 kg more than 1976 Zastava 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 AC Greyhound (179 Nm) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Zastava 1500. (113 Nm). This means 1963 AC Greyhound will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Zastava 1500.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 AC Greyhound | 1976 Zastava 1500 | |
| Make | AC | Zastava |
| Model | Greyhound | 1500 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1480 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 70 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 113 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1010 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4050 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2430 mm |
