1963 AC Greyhound vs. 1979 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1979 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 4,097 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 AC Greyhound (123 HP) has 13 more horse power than 1979 Chevrolet Camaro. (110 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 AC Greyhound should accelerate faster than 1979 Chevrolet Camaro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 540 kg more than 1963 AC Greyhound.
Let's talk about torque, 1979 Chevrolet Camaro (252 Nm) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 1979 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 AC Greyhound | 1979 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | AC | Chevrolet |
| Model | Greyhound | Camaro |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4097 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 110 HP |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 252 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1555 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1250 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2750 mm |
