1963 AC Greyhound vs. 1981 Buick LeSabre
To start off, 1981 Buick LeSabre is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 5,736 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Buick LeSabre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 AC Greyhound (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1981 Buick LeSabre. (105 HP @ 3200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 AC Greyhound should accelerate faster than 1981 Buick LeSabre. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Buick LeSabre weights approximately 785 kg more than 1963 AC Greyhound.
Let's talk about torque, 1981 Buick LeSabre (274 Nm) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 1981 Buick LeSabre will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 AC Greyhound | 1981 Buick LeSabre | |
| Make | AC | Buick |
| Model | Greyhound | LeSabre |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 5736 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 105 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 274 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1800 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 5550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2950 mm |
