1963 AC Greyhound vs. 1990 Ford Aerostar
To start off, 1990 Ford Aerostar is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 2,977 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Ford Aerostar (143 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1963 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Ford Aerostar should accelerate faster than 1963 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Ford Aerostar weights approximately 395 kg more than 1963 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1990 Ford Aerostar (224 Nm) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 1990 Ford Aerostar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 AC Greyhound | 1990 Ford Aerostar | |
| Make | AC | Ford |
| Model | Greyhound | Aerostar |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1990 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2977 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 143 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 224 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1410 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1860 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3030 mm |
