1963 AC Greyhound vs. 1990 Ford Tempo
To start off, 1990 Ford Tempo is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 AC Greyhound (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1990 Ford Tempo. (96 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 AC Greyhound should accelerate faster than 1990 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Ford Tempo weights approximately 135 kg more than 1963 AC Greyhound.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 AC Greyhound (179 Nm) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Ford Tempo. (175 Nm). This means 1963 AC Greyhound will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 AC Greyhound | 1990 Ford Tempo | |
| Make | AC | Ford |
| Model | Greyhound | Tempo |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1990 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2307 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 175 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2540 mm |
