1963 AC Greyhound vs. 1995 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 1995 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 2,295 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mercedes-Benz E (149 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1963 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1963 AC Greyhound.
Let's talk about torque, 1995 Mercedes-Benz E (220 Nm) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 1995 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1963 AC Greyhound | 1995 Mercedes-Benz E | |
Make | AC | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Greyhound | E |
Year Released | 1963 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 149 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 220 Nm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2940 mm |