1963 AC Greyhound vs. 1996 Mazda Sentia
To start off, 1996 Mazda Sentia is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 2,954 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Mazda Sentia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mazda Sentia (158 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1963 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mazda Sentia should accelerate faster than 1963 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mazda Sentia weights approximately 551 kg more than 1963 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mazda Sentia (245 Nm) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 1996 Mazda Sentia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1963 AC Greyhound | 1996 Mazda Sentia | |
Make | AC | Mazda |
Model | Greyhound | Sentia |
Year Released | 1963 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2954 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 245 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1566 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2860 mm |